The Friday July 4 There was a meeting to continue the negotiation of the agreement in Unipost and I did not know. Is that like the night confused me Dinio Summer confuses me (lol). Honestly as I have no desire to work I leave you the information you have CCOO in your forum and it seems the thing of casualties has changed from explained during the strike but still represents, in my opinion, a significant improvement with regarding the current agreement. Text
Unipost CCOO forum:
Unipost CCOO forum:
"Last proposal of the company in reference to temporary disability, proposed at the meeting on Friday, July 4:
- First floor of years, as was established earlier: the day 10 to 15 to 80%, from 16 to 20 to 90% and 21 to 80 (five days have been added) 100%
- Second year low following: from 21 to 80 to 100% (also large)
- All non-occupational accident casualties From day 1 to 80 to 100%.
In case of death of worker illness resulting from the company to complement the 90-day low 100%, obviously that money be remunerated to the heirs of the deceased.
have finally agreed that if there are casualties that are consequences of other casualties accumulate. Example, I pick up a low three-day flu, which does not compliment me anything, but if after four days to fall back on the same basis and the low is fifteen days would join the two floors with it would be in total a low of 18 days and if the company would complement me from day 10. They have also agreed that implementation of this should be from January 1, 2009 as it was in the proposal but after signing the agreement, (or rather, a couple of months later). "
have finally agreed that if there are casualties that are consequences of other casualties accumulate. Example, I pick up a low three-day flu, which does not compliment me anything, but if after four days to fall back on the same basis and the low is fifteen days would join the two floors with it would be in total a low of 18 days and if the company would complement me from day 10. They have also agreed that implementation of this should be from January 1, 2009 as it was in the proposal but after signing the agreement, (or rather, a couple of months later). "
0 comments:
Post a Comment